No. That is the whole point of the chapter, and the title is the joke. It is written as a myth he is taking apart, not as his opinion. He came across an online advert that said “I hate annuities and you should too,” went and looked at who had paid for it, and found somebody selling their own stock picking for a fee. The chapter is him working out whether the criticism actually holds up.
Where he says the criticism is fair. Variable annuities. He is blunt about those. Mutual funds wrapped inside an insurance contract, fees stacked on fees, and he runs the arithmetic at roughly 4.7% a year all in. He tells you to avoid them. We do not place them either.
Where he lands. That there are annuities you should genuinely hate, and that lumping all of them together throws out a tool that has existed since Roman times. His line is that “not all annuities are created equal.”
Who he went and asked. Dr David Babbell, who taught investment at Wharton for over thirty years, ran research for the pension and insurance division at Goldman Sachs, and consulted for the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the Department of Labor. Babbell published his own personal retirement plan. He used income annuities. Robbins flew to Philadelphia for a one-hour interview with him that ran four hours.
He also points at Ben Bernanke’s financial disclosure, the same one above, and at Dr Jeffrey Brown, an advisor to the US Treasury and the World Bank who sat on the Social Security Advisory Board. Brown ran a study on how the same product is described. Presented as an investment, about one in five people found it attractive. Presented as income insurance that keeps paying you for as long as you live, more than seven in ten did.
And the honest part. He is not connected to us, he does not know we exist, and he is selling books. We are telling you the chapter is there because it is the easiest place to get a second opinion that is not ours. Read it and make your own call.
Money Master the Game, Tony Robbins, Chapter 2.7. Summarised here in our words. We are not reproducing the chapter and we do not have any arrangement with the author or the publisher.